看了之後兩個字（第100集）---- 對美國MIT TERMINATOR 2喇叭綫進行開棺驗尸

chrisalex

來自國外論壇的討論，一并摘抄轉載如下，感謝不知名資訊提供者：

Important to understand that the Spectral/MIT relationship is a special one, and does not apply to other components. The design of most Spectral gear actually requires the use of MIT (or Spectral's own) interconnects to damp the circuit. If one does not use these cables, damage to the Spectral component can result.My understanding is that this is because of Spectral's extremely wide bandwidth, undamped output circuit design. MIT cables include damping networks (inside the boxes) required to keep the Spectral gear from going out of control.

Spectral and MIT have explained to me is that the network boxen on MIT cables provide very high frequency behavior that avoids possible damaging oscillations that could otherwise occur due to Spectral amps' extremely wide bandwidth, and that therefore there may be an actual technical reason for Spectral's requirement. If Spectral's requirement has a legitimate technical justification, then it would not be illegal tying.

如果上面的描述是是事實，那麽很可能SPECTRAL功放在設計時追求寬頻要求，需要專門配合的綫材使用才能最大程度發揮，MIT正好是這樣的一個蘿蔔一個坑的搭配，所以搭配其他綫反而會不好聽，影響發揮，甚至是產生故障。

好了，將盒子裝回去了，那個啥，誰要啊？

james_0075

还以为里面有线路板呢。

故事

next time try to discover Transparent cable.